Chapter 2200
Chapter 2200 covers ex parte reexamination. Any person can request reexamination based on patents and printed publications only. Key rule: third-party requester has NO participation rights after the reexamination order is granted — only patent owner and examiner continue.
Core Concepts
Who Can Request — MPEP 2209 Any person including the patent owner, third parties, or the USPTO Director. Anonymous requests permitted. Filed with fee. Based on prior art patents and printed publications ONLY — cannot raise public use, on-sale, or other statutory bars.
Substantial New Question — MPEP 2242 SNQ of patentability must exist to order reexamination. SNQ can be based on art previously considered by examiner if presented differently. Different from IPR standard (reasonable likelihood of prevailing). Director orders or denies reexamination — not petitionable if denied.
Third-Party Requester Rights — MPEP 2254 After reexamination order: third-party requester has NO further participation rights. Only patent owner and examiner continue prosecution. Requester cannot file comments, responses, or appeals. Patent owner may amend claims — only narrow amendments allowed, no broadening.
Reexamination Prosecution — MPEP 2260 Conducted like regular examination but in reexamination context. Patent owner may amend claims — only narrowing amendments. New claims may be added if narrower than original claims. Examiner may reject on new grounds of rejections.
Appeal from Reexamination — MPEP 2279 Patent owner may appeal examiner rejection to PTAB. Third-party requester: NO appeal rights in ex parte reexamination. After PTAB: appeal to Federal Circuit.
Merger with Pending Litigation — MPEP 2286 Court may stay litigation pending reexamination. Reexamination certificate issued at end — cancels rejected claims, confirms patentable claims, incorporates amended claims.
Key Rules
EXAM TIP
Third-party requester participation rule is the most tested point: after reexamination is ordered, third party disappears entirely — no comments, no responses, no appeals. Contrast with IPR where petitioner has full participation rights throughout. This asymmetry is a frequent exam question.
Common Traps
Search Terms
Want to study each section in depth?
Create a free account to access all MPEP sections, ~50 practice questions, and a full exam simulation.